The Use of Complementary & Alternative Medicine in Mental Disorders

Research Paper Title

Mental disorders and the use of alternative medicine: results from a national survey.

Background

The study examined the relationship between mental disorders and the use of complementary and alternative medicine.

Methods

Data from a national household telephone survey conducted in 1997-1998 (N=9,585) were used to examine the relationships between use of complementary and alternative medicine during the past 12 months and several demographic variables and indicators of mental disorders. Structured diagnostic screening interviews were used to establish diagnoses of probable mental disorders.

Results

Use of complementary and alternative medicine during the past 12 months was reported by 16.5% of the respondents. Of those respondents, 21.3% met diagnostic criteria for one or more mental disorders, compared to 12.8% of respondents who did not report use of alternative medicine. Individuals with panic disorder and major depression were significantly more likely to use alternative medicine than those without those disorders. Respondents with mental disorders who reported use of alternative medicine were as likely to use conventional mental health services as respondents with mental disorders who did not use alternative medicine.

Conclusions

The researchers found relatively high rates of use of complementary and alternative medicine among respondents who met criteria for common mental disorders. Practitioners of alternative medicine should look for these disorders in their patients, and conventional medical providers should ask their depressed and anxious patients about the use of alternative medicine. More research is needed to determine if individuals with mental disorders use alternative medicine because conventional medical care does not meet their health care needs.

Reference

Unutzer, J., Klap, R., Sturm, R., Young, A.S., Marmon, T., Shatkin, J. & Wells, K.B. (2020) Mental disorders and the use of alternative medicine: results from a national survey. The American Journal of Psychiatry. 157(11), pp.1851-1857. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.157.11.1851.

Is the Association between Mental Disorders & Cardiovascular Disease Spurious or Real?

Research Paper Title

PsyCoLaus: mental disorders and cardiovascular diseases: spurious association?

Background

Cardio-vascular diseases (CVD), their well established risk factors (CVRF) and mental disorders are common and co-occur more frequently than would be expected by chance.

However, the mechanisms underlying this association are still poorly understood.

The main study questions of PsyCoLaus, the psychiatric arm of CoLaus, are:

  • Do mental disorders increase vulnerability to CVRF and CVD?
  • Do CVRF and CVD promote the development of mental disorders?
  • Do CVRF/ CVD and mental disorders share common pathogenetic processes?

The longitudinal project adds a comprehensive psychiatric evaluation to the CoLaus investigation.

A better understanding of the psychological, physiological and behavioural links underlying CVD/ CVRF and mental disorders will result in the development of more specific and efficient strategies of prevention and treatment for both psychiatric and CVD/CVRF, two major elements of burden of disease.

Reference

Preisig, M., Waeber, G., Mooser, V. & Vollenweider, P. (2020) PsyCoLaus: mental disorders and cardiovascular diseases: spurious association? Revue Medicale Suisse. 7(315), pp.2127-2129.

What are the Current Trends in Therapy for Mental Disorders in Adolescence?

Research Paper Title

Mental disorders in adolescence: current trends in therapy.

Background

On the basis of the high prevalence for behavioural problems and mental disorders in adolescence and its persistence into adulthood it is tested whether and based upon which emphasis this topic is considered in the recent discussion on psychotherapy.

Therefore, a bibliometric analysis is given that summarizes the issue in the 2011 and 2012 volumes of representative German child and adolescent psychological and psychiatric journals.

The focus lies on conduct disorder, depression, deliberate self-harm, dissociative disorder, and post traumatic stress disorder.

Reference

de Vries, U., Lehmkuhl, G. & Petermann, F. (2020) Mental disorders in adolescence: current trends in therapy.

Are Treatments for Common Mental Disorders also Effective for Functional Symptoms & Disorder?

Research Paper Title

Are treatments for common mental disorders also effective for functional symptoms and disorder?

Background

To consider whether the many types of treatments for mental disorders – both those specifically targeting illness mechanisms and nonspecific elements – are also effective in treating functional symptoms and syndromes. The paper discusses the need for well-organised care that emphasizes early treatment and recognition of more complex problems in primary and secondary medical care.

Methods

Evidence from a wide range of research and clinical experience is used to identify and illustrate general themes.

Results

Despite a limited evidence base, it is clear that both specific and nonspecific interventions that are effective with mental disorders are also effective in treating functional complaints. They are also helpful in the management of maladaptive reactions to physical disorders. Delivery is most effective as stepped care.

Conclusions

There is a particular need for more evidence on the effectiveness of the nonspecific elements of treatment and of their most appropriate delivery by non-specialists in general medical settings.

Experience with a variety of treatment methods will enhance our understanding of psychological and other etiological variables and thereby influence the development of improved definitions in Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders-5(th) Edition.

It is argued that a main focus of review of somatoform disorder should be the resolution of conceptual problems.

Reference

Mayou, R. (2020) Are treatments for common mental disorders also effective for functional symptoms and disorder? Psychosomatic Medicine. 69(9), pp.876-880. doi: 10.1097/PSY.0b013e31815b00a6.

Is Neuroanalysis a Useful Method for Brain-Related Neuroscientific Diagnosis of Mental Disorders?

Research Paper Title

Neuroanalysis: a method for brain-related neuroscientific diagnosis of mental disorders.

Background

As an Ancient Chinese proverb says “The beginning of wisdom is to call things by their right names” thus we must start calling mental disorders by the names of their underlying brain disturbances. Without knowledge of the causes of mental disorders, their cures will remain elusive.

Methods

Neuroanalysis is a literature-based re-conceptualisation of mental disorders as disturbances of brain organisation. Psychosis and schizophrenia can be re-conceptualised as disturbances to connectivity and hierarchical dynamics in the brain; mood disorders can be re-conceptualised as disturbances to optimization dynamics and free energy in the brain, and finally personality disorders can be re-conceptualised as disordered default-mode networks in the brain.

Results and Conclusions

Knowledge and awareness of the disease algorithms of mental disorders will become critical because powerful technologies for controlling brain activity are developing and becoming available. The time will soon come when psychiatrists will be asked to define the exact ‘algorithms’ of disturbances in their psychiatric patients. Neuroanalysis can be a starting point for the response to that challenge.

Reference

Peled, A. (2020) Neuroanalysis: a method for brain-related neuroscientific diagnosis of mental disorders. Medical Hypotheses. 78(5), pp.636-640. doi: 10.1016/j.mehy.2012.01.043. Epub 2012 Feb 18.

Qigong and its Role in Mental Disorders

Research Paper Title

Qigong-induced mental disorders: a review.

Background

This review article aims to explore current opinions on Qigong-induced mental disorders, an entity which is unfamiliar to Western psychiatrists.

Method

Relevant literature published in Chinese and English is reviewed.

Results

The review is divided into three sections:

  • First, there is brief consideration of the historical development of Qigong in traditional Chinese medicine and its role in psychiatry;
  • Second, there is a review of the literature published on Qigong deviations and Qigong-induced mental disorders; and
  • Third, there is a discussion on the aetiological role of Qigong in these conditions.

Conclusions

Qigong remained veiled in secrecy and available only to the elite until the early 1980s. Despite the widespread use of Qigong, there is a conspicuous lack of controlled data regarding its effects on mental health.

Qigong, when practised inappropriately, may induce abnormal psychosomatic responses and even mental disorders. However, the ties between Qigong and mental disorders are manifold, and a causal relationship is difficult to establish.

Many so-called ‘Qigong-induced psychoses’ may be more appropriately labelled ‘Qigong-precipitated psychoses’, where the practice of Qigong acts as a stressor in vulnerable individuals.

Reference

Ng, B.Y. (2020) Qigong-induced mental disorders: a review. The Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry. 33(2), pp.197-206. doi: 10.1046/j.1440-1614.1999.00536.x.

What is Qigong?

Qigong, which is sometimes spelled Chi-Kung (and pronounced chee-gung), is the study and practice of cultivating vital life-force through various techniques, including:

  • Breathing techniques.
  • Postures.
  • Meditations.
  • Guided imagery.

Qi means “breath” or “air” and is considered the “vital-life-force” or “life-force energy.” Qigong practitioners believe that this vital-life-force penetrates and permeates everything in the universe. It corresponds to the Greek “pneuma,” the Sanskrit “prana,” or the Western medical conception of “bioelectricity.”

Gong means “work” or “effort” and is the commitment an individual puts into any practice or skill that requires time, patience, and repetition to perfect.

Through study, the individual aims to develop the ability to manipulate Qi in order to promote self-healing, prevent disease, and increase longevity.

Mental Disorders, Personality Traits & Impaired Work Functioning: Is There an Association?

Research Paper Title

Mental disorders and personality traits as determinants of impaired work functioning.

Background

Both mental disorders and personality characteristics are associated with impaired work functioning, but these determinants have not yet been studied together. The aim of this paper is to examine the impairing effects that mental disorders and personality characteristics (i.e. neuroticism, locus of control and self-esteem) have on work functioning.

Methods

Data for a representative sample of 3570 working people were derived from the first two waves of the Netherlands Mental Health Survey and Incidence Study (NEMESIS), a prospective cohort study in the Dutch adult population.

Results

Higher neuroticism, more external locus of control and lower self-esteem were each significantly associated with subsequent impairment in work functioning, independently of any effects from mental disorders. Associations between mental disorders and subsequent work impairment disappeared once personality traits were taken into account. Personality traits did not moderate the relationships between mental disorders and work functioning.

Conclusions

Working people with vulnerable personalities have a greater risk of impaired work functioning, independent of the risk from any mental disorder they may have.

Reference

Michon, H.W.C., Have, M.T., Kroon, H., van Weeghel, J., de Graaf, R. & Schene, A.H. (2020) Mental disorders and personality traits as determinants of impaired work functioning. Psychological Medicine. 38(11), pp.1627-1637. doi: 10.1017/S0033291707002449. Epub 2008 Jan 21.

With Regard to Mental Health & Substance Use Disorders what is the Reality of Youth in Custody?

Research Paper Title

Mental health and substance use disorders: The reality of youth in custody.

Background

Young offenders experience a higher prevalence of mental health disorders and substance use disorders than the general population, estimated to be between 70% and 90% (Indig et al. 2011; Kenny et al., 2006; Lader et al., 2000; Teplin et al., 2002). In addition, comorbidities affect many young offenders, with over 60% presenting with two or more disorders (Justice Health & Forensic Mental Health Network and Juvenile Justice NSW, 2015). The prevalence of mental health disorders is higher among females, with young female offenders more likely to be diagnosed with anxiety and depressive disorders, as well as substance‐induced disorders (Justice Health & Forensic Mental Health Network and Juvenile Justice NSW, 2015).

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander youth are over‐represented within the juvenile justice system. In a report by the Australian Institute of Health and Welfare, it was found that 50% of young offenders in 2016-2017 identified as Aboriginal and/or Torres Strait Islander (Australian Institute of Health and Welfare 2018). Mental health and substance use disorders are the most common non‐communicable diseases among this group with 33% reporting high to very high levels of psychological distress (Azzopardi et al. 2018). Furthermore, there is evidence to suggest that poor family cohesion and the presence of adverse events in this group of adolescents are a reliable predictor of negative mental health outcomes (Young et al. 2016).

A recent Australian study reported the strongest predictor of incarceration and re‐incarceration was problematic alcohol and drug use (Indig et al., 2016). Indig et al. found that young people who were heavy drinkers were seven times more likely to have been previously incarcerated and three times more likely to be re‐incarcerated within 18 months. Indig et al. (2016) also found that illicit substance use was a consistent predictor of incarceration and re‐incarceration.

In addition to issues with drugs and alcohol, many incarcerated young people also report experiencing adverse childhood experiences during their childhood years with as many as 90% reporting at least one traumatic event (Ford et al., 2012). A recent Australian study found that 60% of young offenders reported a history of child abuse or neglect, 20% met the criteria for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) (Moore et al. 2013). A history of adverse childhood experiences is the main predictor of a diagnosis of PTSD (Moore et al. 2013). Evidence suggests a link between exposure to adverse childhood experiences and the occurrence of various mental health difficulties among young offenders (McReynolds & Wasserman, 2011; Wasserman & McReynolds, 2011; Wilson et al., 2009).

It is unfortunate that many troubled youth are not recognized as being distressed or having mental health difficulties, and so do not have access to appropriate mental health care. Furthermore, these young people and their families may have very low levels of mental health literacy. However, once these young people come to the attention of the justice system, we have an opportunity to raise mental health literacy and provide appropriate services. There is a need for programmes and services that address mental health and substance use issues to assist young people improve their health outcomes and reduce their offending behaviours. Programmes such as monthly recovery management check‐ups in the first 90 days postrelease could help to achieve this outcome (Indig et al., 2016).

Given the high rate of adverse childhood experiences in incarcerated youth and the known link to PTSD, we need to ensure that services are informed by a trauma informed approach (Moore et al. 2013). There is also an identified need to invest in prevention and early intervention for young people. Currently, there are diversion programmes offered within the local court system in NSW for adult offenders exhibiting mental health (Statewide Community & Court Liaison Service) or substance use disorders (Magistrates Early Referral Into Treatment (MERIT)). However, these programmes are not available to offenders under the age of 18 years and adolescent diversion programmes are not routinely or diversely available to young people residing outside of the Sydney metropolitan area.

The mental health and substance use issues affecting young offenders challenge us to respond with effective interventions. Mental health nurses have an important role to play in improving the services and interventions available to these young people. Changes have been made to services for young offenders but more needs to be done. Research has shown that diversion and treatment services delivered in the community using a trauma informed approach are more effective in this population (Dierkhising et al. 2013). Moving forward, mental health nurses have an opportunity to take the lead in this important area.

Reference

Usher, K., Douglas, L. & Jackson, D. (2020) Mental health and substance use disorders: The reality of youth in custody. International Journal of Mental Health Nursing. 28(3). https://doi.org/10.1111/inm.12597.

The Current Debate on Whether Somatoform Disorders are Mental Disorders

Research Paper Title

Are somatoform disorders ‘mental disorders’? A contribution to the current debate.

Background

During the last 2 years, a debate has started over whether the somatoform symptoms/medically unexplained symptoms are wrongly placed under the category of mental disorders (section F in International classification of diseases-10 and in Diagnostic and statistical manual for mental disorders-IV).

Recent Findings

Most experts on medically unexplained symptoms agree that there is a substantial need for revision of the diagnoses of somatoform disorders. While some authors suggest moving the somatoform disorders from axis I to axis III, others suggest improving the classification of these syndromes on axis I, such as by using empirically derived criteria and by introducing psychological descriptors which justify the categorisation as a mental disorder.

In contrast to the situation when the last version of Diagnostic and statistical manual for mental disorders was published, new empirical data has shown some psychological and behavioural characteristics of patients with somatoform symptoms. These and other empirically founded approaches can be landmarks for the revision of this section in Diagnostic and statistical manual for mental disorders-V and International classification of diseases-11.

Summary

The classification of somatoform disorders as ‘mental disorders’ could be justified if empirically founded psychological and behavioural characteristics are included into the classification process.

Attention focusing, symptom catastrophising, and symptom expectation are outlined as possible examples of involved psychological processes.

Reference

Rief, W. & Isaac, M. (2020) Are somatoform disorders ‘mental disorders’? A contribution to the current debate. Current Opinion in Psychiatry. 20(2), pp.143-146. doi: 10.1097/YCO.0b013e3280346999.

Highlighting the Hidden Links between Mental Disorders

Research Paper Title

The hidden links between mental disorders.

Background

Psychiatrists have a dizzying array of diagnoses and not enough treatments. Hunting for the hidden biology underlying mental disorders could help.

In 2018, psychiatrist Oleguer Plana-Ripoll was wrestling with a puzzling fact about mental disorders. He knew that many individuals have multiple conditions – anxiety and depression, say, or schizophrenia and bipolar disorder. He wanted to know how common it was to have more than one diagnosis, so he got his hands on a database containing the medical details of around 5.9 million Danish citizens.

You can continue reading the full article here.

Reference

Marshall, M. (2020) The hidden links between mental disorders. Nature. 581(7806), pp.19-21. doi: 10.1038/d41586-020-00922-8.